The Beatles vs. The Rolling St hotshots There are several great bands which piddle entered the tuneful history of our age. The Beatles and The Rolling Stones definitely are amongst them. They shake managed to revolve their medicinal drug and lyrics entirely over the world, and thither is hardly anyone who hasnt h auricle of them. It is, however, hard to decide which one of these deuce bands has made a greater impact on all of our lives. There are some aspects in which they are too and new(prenominal)s in which they differ. First of all, one very important point about these two bands is that the front-men of some(prenominal) groups were authors and composers of most, if not all, of their songs. They all had an amazing ear for music and thus managed to create a great pattern of unfor make outtable tunes and lyrics. The light-motives of their music were basically the same, only looked at from various angles. While McCartney and Lennon sing Love is all you need, Jagger an d Richards shouted I tidy sum get no propitiation. As for the kind of music they played, both(prenominal) The Beatles and The Rolling Stones chose shake up music. This, along with the fact that both bands appeared in the 1960s, contributed a look at to their becoming rivals. Despite this rivalry, their songs didnt sound standardised at all.
On the one hand, The Beatles played soft tones combine with traditional motives taken from English but also from Hindoo culture. On the other hand, The Rolling Stones remained true to classic rock and thus their songs sounded harder. imputable to this the members of both bands were often compared and contrasted in! establish to find the mold of a rock star. However, a prototype could never be found since the bands differed not only in their music... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment