The Allais effect -- Changing our views on gravity and how it works.

In 1954 Maurice Allais, a French economist who would go on to learn the Nobel prize, decided to observe and record the movements of a pendulum everywhere a period of 30 days. Simultaneously, during one of his observations, a solar bulk boast skilfuly took place. Just as the moon passed in the midst of the sun and the earth, the pendulum began sorrowful faster that expected. Now known as the Allais effect, it contradicts Einsteins theory of usual theory of relativity - The modern chronicle of how temperance works. This affect is so small, however, that it would take about a day for the apple to pass away from a manoeuver if it were the only gravitational effect acting upon it. Ironically, the observations taken during a solar eclipse established superior general Relativity in the starting place. Therefore, many scientists have time-tested to copy Allais experiment. The results werent equal, however, causing this to be an even bigger mystery. Most explanations count to have an effect too miniscule to be a major part of this phenomenon. It is still a possibility, however, that Einsteins theory of general Relativity is wrong. There are still a some explanations, nevertheless, that take in charge to explain the Allais effect. The first explanation is called Majorana. This theory states that large masses partially hold the gravitational force from to a greater extent inappropriate objects. If this is correct, the moon can partially be city stem the gravitational effects of the sun from reaching the earth. Another explanation is called MOND (short for modify Newtonian Dynamics) which suggests that at extremely low accelerations, solemnity take a craps middling stronger. An even stranger theory is that the force of gravity is antithetic at different directions. Most physicists dislike that one.

It uses the imagination of frames of reference, in which movement, acceleration, and so on are not equal in all directions. But it... forgot to add this (bibliography): Economist, The. An invisible overturn?. 19 Aug 2004. Economist.com. The Economist. 20 Aug 2004 <http://www.economist.com/science/PrinterFr iendly.cfm?Story_ID=3104321>. give thanks for including the bibliography - as I always say, its nice to know where you get your culture from & helps prevent plagiarism on the site. This demonstrate was very helpful. If you want to get a full essay, format it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.c om

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper