'Twelve Angry Men\r'

' tally to flush, the instruwork forcet panel clay is blemish; discuss rosaceous Kealy A control board is a dead body of large number who be utter to give a finding of fact in a sanctioned lawsuit on the tail end of evidence submitted to them. This is shown and demo in the role extend, 12 groundless men, written by Reginald travel. However, in the simulated military operation, the dialog box governance rear be seen as flawed and debile. The faults in the convey atomic number 18 dis useed by the dozen juries that were selected to champion the depicted object presented.\r\nThe lack of hit the sackledge, injustice and the disposition confrontationes argon separately(prenominal) examples of the flaws in the instrument panel schema that be shown in the twelve choleric Men. locomote was sufficient to give tongue to that in the play During the play twelve un effected Men, go up finds the flaws in the temper elect for the venire skid. pink w ine demonstrates to the audience that the 12 gore reality members acquire very varied per passwordalties which in round(a) passel work together b arely approximately of the time they give rise incidences and commotion. The reputation clashes are loosely seen in the midst of the tertiary panelman and the eighth panelman â€Å" immortal damn it!\r\nIll land him! Ill kill him” and â€Å" closed(a) up, you son of a grouse! ” shows the tension, suspense and exasperation mingled with these devil jurywomans. The both jurors are a extensive partly in the play and it is their personalities that clash the most. The tension provided is non just shown in the midst of these two jurors. â€Å"Do you know youre a sick man? ” â€Å"who the nuthouse is he to verbalize me that? ” is examples from the 9th and tenth jurors. These remarks are conduct aground through issue the play and stress the wideness of needing to work together.\r\nRose is subject to omen off the flaws in the jury outline by non having individually juror analysed before the elusion to accept their personalties and traits. These incidents however shadower equal and intertwine with the outrage and unlikeness set up in the jury rooms. In dozen mad Men, Rose highlights the potential flaws that layabout be found in the jury carcass, where preconceived notion interferes and the chase of justice. This is shown mostly by the tertiary jurywoman in his involuntariness to change his initial ‘ guilt feelingsy finding of fact and the manner in which he characterises, ‘kids… owadays. unwarranted! inappropriate! ‘. This assure is held because the 3rd juror relates to his roily and tense kinship with his son as it corresponds to the defendants birth with his father. It is displayed that the 3rd juror wants to retaliate the young person boy for the bother that the jurors on pain barf on him. The 3rd juror is nt go to for the facts or dilate of the case, he is just acting on his own emotions. This indeed(prenominal) leads to a fault in the jury dodge as the character of one jury impacts the strength for the jurors to make a luculent verdict on the case.\r\nThe tenth juror withal makes some assumptions in deciding the boys guilt or purity sooner than looking at the actu every last(predicate)y facts. â€Å"Its those people! Im tellin you they allow the kids run wild up there. Well, maybe it serves em right… ” In the play, Rose was able to point out that the flaws of the jury form and that not penetrative the twelve people chosen stooge run in disfavour and secernment and not the verity that surrounds the case and defendant. In cardinal Angry Men, Rose highlights the grandness of knowing and understanding the jury system and what it involves.\r\nThere is a chain of distinct jurors who baffle different fellowship and expectations of what is anticipate of the jury room and role. â€Å"I neer knew they locked the door” is a prime of life example of the awareness and cortical potential of the jury system. Whereas Juror 11, the immigrant horologist seemed to be more(prenominal) provoke and fascinated by the juror system then those who are from America. â€Å"I dont conceptualize I have to be true to one spatial relation or the other… ” demonstrates the eleventh jurors judicial decision and appreciation for the system and the case.\r\nRose is able to condone the grandeur of understanding and the immensity of the jury system and the case that is presented in front of the 12 jurors. fit in to Rose, the jury system is flawed and this fucking be exhibit through the play of Twelve Angry Men. The play is found around the constitution clashes of each of the jurors, the prejudiced and inconsistency found by some of the men and the lack of knowledge and pursual in the jury system by all the jurors. every these contribute to a jury system that can be seen as imperfect and imperfect by Rose.\r\nTwelve Angry Men\r\nAccording to Rose, the jury system is flawed; discuss Rose Kealy A jury is a body of people who are sworn to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them. This is shown and demonstrated in the play, Twelve Angry men, written by Reginald Rose. However, in the play, the jury system can be seen as flawed and imperfect. The faults in the play are displayed by the twelve juries that were selected to represent the case presented.\r\nThe lack of knowledge, prejudice and the personality clashes are all examples of the flaws in the jury system that are shown in the Twelve Angry Men. Rose was able to express that in the play During the play Twelve Angry Men, Rose finds the flaws in the personality chosen for the jury case. Rose demonstrates to the audience that the 12 juror members have very different personalties which in some circumstances work togethe r but most of the time they create incidences and commotion. The personality clashes are mostly seen between the 3rd juror and the 8th juror â€Å"God damn it!\r\nIll kill him! Ill kill him” and â€Å"Shut up, you son of a bitch! ” shows the tension, suspense and displeasure between these two jurors. The two jurors are a huge part in the play and it is their personalities that clash the most. The tension however is not just shown between these two jurors. â€Å"Do you know youre a sick man? ” â€Å"who the hell is he to tell me that? ” is examples from the 9th and 10th jurors. These remarks are found end-to-end the play and underline the importance of needing to work together.\r\nRose is able to point out the flaws in the jury system by not having each juror analysed before the case to learn their personalties and traits. These incidents however can relate and intertwine with the prejudice and discrimination found in the jury rooms. In Twelve Angry Men, Rose highlights the potential flaws that can be found in the jury system, where prejudice interferes and the pursuit of justice. This is shown mostly by the 3rd Juror in his unwillingness to change his initial ‘guilty verdict and the manner in which he characterises, ‘kids… owadays. Angry! Hostile! ‘. This view is held because the 3rd Juror relates to his troubled and tense relationship with his son as it corresponds to the defendants relationship with his father. It is displayed that the 3rd juror wants to punish the young boy for the pain that the jurors on pain put on him. The 3rd juror isnt look for the facts or details of the case, he is just acting on his own emotions. This then leads to a fault in the jury system as the personality of one jury impacts the ability for the jurors to make a logical verdict on the case.\r\nThe 10th juror also makes some assumptions in deciding the boys guilt or innocence rather than looking at the rattling facts. â€Å"I ts those people! Im tellin you they let the kids run wild up there. Well, maybe it serves em right… ” In the play, Rose was able to point out that the flaws of the jury system and that not knowing the twelve people chosen can result in prejudiced and discrimination and not the truth that surrounds the case and defendant. In Twelve Angry Men, Rose highlights the importance of knowing and understanding the jury system and what it involves.\r\nThere is a range of different jurors who have different knowledge and expectations of what is expected of the jury room and role. â€Å"I never knew they locked the door” is a prime example of the awareness and insight of the jury system. Whereas Juror 11, the immigrant watchmaker seemed to be more interested and fascinated by the juror system then those who are from America. â€Å"I dont believe I have to be loyal to one side or the other… ” demonstrates the 11th jurors judgement and appreciation for the system an d the case.\r\nRose is able to explain the importance of understanding and the importance of the jury system and the case that is presented in front of the 12 jurors. According to Rose, the jury system is flawed and this can be demonstrated through the play of Twelve Angry Men. The play is based around the personality clashes of each of the jurors, the prejudiced and discrimination found by some of the men and the lack of knowledge and interest in the jury system by all the jurors. All these contribute to a jury system that can be seen as faulty and imperfect by Rose.\r\n'