.

Saturday, January 19, 2019

How Democratic was Andrew Jackson?

Andrew capital of Mississippi was a egalitarian man by supporting the peoples choices and absent their voices to be as heard, however that is non the case throughout his presidency. He is considered Democratic because he valued everyones opinions to be heard and equ aloney represented. Democracy can ingest different meanings, but ultimately they all correspond with each other. A democracy is a government ran by the people through the representatives that were elected. The democracy has a principle of equality in the midst of social clanes and between individuals.capital of Mississippi believed that the rich and healthy people got away with fold the acts of the government to get what they wanted, as sh let in record F. He wrote a bank veto message to congress on July 10th, 1832, capital of Mississippi is apprehensive that the more than one fourth of the stock is in foreign pass and the rest is in the hands of the richest class citizens. Jackson believes that the rich and powerful people bend the acts of the government to fulfill their selfish needs.Andrew Jackson wants the shore leave and independence to be restores in the banks for our country. Andrew Jacksons childhood as shown in the background essay was approximately how he grew up and what he was exposed to as a child. Jacksons father died originally he was born so his mother was his primary tutelagetaker who did non have much money. He also enlisted in the Revolutionary war at the young age of 13 imagine being 13 and press release to war, now of days that kind of exposure to adolescences is absurd.Andrew Jackson was non an promiscuous child to raise, but his attitude, hard headed personality, and persistence can be seen as a benefit in schedule D explaining that no national how old Jackson was, he always had that stern attitude with him. In this document Jackson insisted that all the offices from the appointed or elected should be under the control of the peoples rule. Also he though t it would be passably equal if the President should only serve a single call of four years, this way if one need of the people was not satisfied then hopefully the next President would succeed in that flaw.Although Jacksons harsh personality may have been beneficial at times, at other times it can be interpreted different. enrolment E shows a picture of Andrew Jackson dressed as a king standing upon the Constitution of the coupled States that is ripped to pieces. This is obviously a semipolitical cartoon coming from nighone who did not support Jacksons decisions. The cartoon is inferring that Jackson acted as a king and make his own rules, rather than acting like the President. Some of the decisions he brought about made it difficult for people to see him as democratic.For example in document O it showed a chart of Andrew Jacksons slaveholdings, the numbers visibly increased during his presidency throughout 1829-1837. This goes in the complete opposite educational activity of democracy. Personally it seems like Jackson was only democratic when it referred to his needs also. This is not saying that Jackson was some kind of manipulating jerk who only condole withd about himself, he adept did things not completely for the peoples needs, and document M proves exactly that point.Jackson did do a very noble and heartwarming thing by adopting Lyncoya, especially since Lyncoya had no one to take care of him and the other people wanted him dead. In the letter he wrote to his wife Rachel he said that it Charity and Christianity says he ought be taken care of this proves he honestly did care about others and ultimately did want the scoop thing for them. On the other hand the other letter he wrote to Rachel was telling Rachel to tell their adopted son to read his book and do what she said, showing that Lyncoya must have been acting out.Taking Lyncoya out of his comfort order and everything that he knew may have not been the best thing for him Jackson was try ing to convert him into the American lifestyle that Lyncoya was not used to. The Indian removal map in document L shows that the natives were not respected among the Americans. All the natives from the Seminole tribe in Florida, to the Choctaw tribe in Mississippi were laboured into the Indian territory located by Arkansas and Missouri, or in other words out of the states. And in Document K shows that the natives were not included in this democracy since their opinions did not matter to the rest of the United States.The Cherokee Nation just wanted to live on the land that they lived on for years, they didnt want to be moved to a better place, they wanted to stay on their land because it was sentimental to them and it was their home. They didnt rebel against the American people , but lived in peace with and fought together as alliances. The natives just wanted to stay where they grew up and that was what they spoke.Andrew Jackson did seem like he cared about the Indians in document J by trying to process the Indians out by setting up a distinct bailiwick for them to live, butwhat he didnt listen to or understand was that it was their home, not just a place where they lived. In conclusion, you could say that Andrew Jackson was democratic by the way he wanted to help the lower class be heard and brought equal to the wealthier class. But then again his encounters with the aboriginal Americans and the facts with his slaveholdings make him seem undemocratic. However, I really do believe that Andrew Jackson tried to do the best thing for the people, but I do not believe that he elaborated much on some of the complicated situations he dealt with throughout his time as President.

No comments:

Post a Comment